• Search

Military Police Inquired About Using ‘Heat Ray’ For DC Protesters

Washington, DC – A U.S. military whistleblower told Congress that the top military police officer in the District of Columbia (DC) asked for information about additional non-lethal weapons the United States had in its crowd-control arsenal several hours before officers cleared Lafayette Square of violent protesters on the first day of June.

DC National Guard Major Adam Demarco submitted written statements to the House Committee on Natural Resources that included an email from the provost marshal of Joint Force Headquarters, NPR reported.

DeMarco said the email from the provost marshal asked if they had a Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) or an Active Denial System (ADS) available in their arsenal.

LRAD is a sound canon and an ADS, more commonly referred to a “heat ray,” emits a direct beam of energy that causes a burning heat sensation without actually burning the skin, the Associated Press reported.

ADS is a non-lethal way to control crowds made up of both enemies and civilians, but it hasn’t been officially put into use in combat because some questions remained about whether it actually caused more serious burns than was initially thought.

Colonel Robert Phillips, a spokesperson for the Joint Force Headquarters Command, confirmed that the question was asked but said it was done “as a matter of due diligence and prudent military planning,” NPR reported.

Phillips said the command “inquired informally about capabilities across the full-spectrum of non-lethal systems, to include the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) and Active Denial System (ADS).”

“JFHQ-NCR does not possess these systems, did not request such systems, and no further action was taken as a result of the officer’s E-Mail query,” the colonel added, according to NPR.

DeMarco, who has sought whistleblower protection, said in his statement that the provost marshal’s email had opined that “ADS can provide our troops a capability they currently do not have, the ability to reach out and engage potential adversaries at distances well beyond small arms range, and in a safe, effective, and non-lethal manner.”

He told Congress the email said the heat ray “provides a sensation of intense heat on the surface of the skin. The effect is overwhelming, causing an immediate repel response by the targeted individual,” NPR reported.

“The D.C. National Guard was not in possession of either an LRAD or an ADS,” DeMarco said he responded to the email about 30 minutes after he received it.

Interestingly, NPR reported that authorities may have violated court-ordered regulations on how protesters are to be warned in the nation’s capital by failing to use an LRAD.

The 2015 settlement surrounding the mass arrest of protesters in Lafayette Park declared that police were required to give multiple orders to disperse that could be heard for several blocks.

Protesters have complained they heard no announcements to disperse and received no audible warnings before police deployed teargas and other less-lethal munitions in front of the White House on June 1, NPR reported.

U.S. Park Police Acting Chief Gregory Monahan told lawmakers in July that Park Police followed the rules in that agreement.

“The protocol was followed,” Chief Monahan told the committee under oath, according to NPR. “There were three warnings given and they were given utilizing a Long Range Acoustic Device; it’s called an LRAD, that’s what it stands for, that was the device used.”

But DeMarco said in his statement to the committee that the National Guard “was not in possession” of an LRAD on the day in question, NPR reported.

“There is zero evidence that there were any officers who can testify that they were in the farthest reaches of the crowd,” Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, who helped write the settlement agreement with the Park Police that created the new rule. “There has to be documentation that the notice was given multiple times, and there are supposed to be recordings made that the notice was given. We wrote all these in specifically for this reason. In fact, unfortunately, it would appear in anticipation of what happened in Lafayette Park.”

Written by
Sandy Malone

Managing Editor - Twitter/@SandyMalone_ - Prior to joining The Police Tribune, Sandy wrote the Politics.Net column for the Wall Street Journal and was managing editor of Campaigns & Elections magazine. More recently, she was an internationally-syndicated columnist for Conde Nast (BRIDES), The Huffington Post, and Monsters and Critics. Sandy is married to a retired police captain and former SWAT commander.

View all articles
Written by Sandy Malone


Sign up to our daily newsletter so you don't miss out on the latest events surrounding law enforcement!

Follow Me

Follow us on social media and be sure to mark us as "See First."