• Search

Ghislaine Maxwell Requests Dismissal Of Verdict After Juror Gives Interviews About Being Sexually Abused

New York, NY – Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell have filed a motion requesting a new trial after one of the jurors who convicted her gave multiple interviews about how his own experiences being sexually abused had helped him to convince other jurors of her guilt.

Bobbi Sternheim, one of Maxwell’s defense attorneys, filed a letter to U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan on Jan. 19 that included the request for a new trial, CNN reported.

Sternheim also requested that all materials pertaining to “Juror No. 50” remain under seal until Nathan has ruled on a new trial.

Prosecutors have until Feb. 2 to reply to the motion, according to the Associated Press.

A jury convicted Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime girlfriend on Dec. 29, 2021 of five of the six counts levied against her in connection with her role in the sexual abuse of multiple minor girls as young as 14.

Maxwell, 60, was charged with six counts alleging she had conspired with Epstein and aided in his recruitment, enticement, and trafficking of underage girls between 1994 and 2004.

Her sentencing had tentatively been scheduled for June.

But on Jan. 5, Juror No. 50 gave an interview to The Independent during which he explained he why he voted to convict Maxwell on all of the charges against her.

“I personally was willing to find her guilty on count two,” he said. “But we all decided in the end that there wasn’t enough evidence.”

The juror, who chose to be called by his first and middle names, Scotty David, said he was proud to help hold Maxwell accountable.

“This verdict is for all the victims,” David told The Independent. “For those who testified, for those who came forward and for those who haven’t come forward. I’m glad that Maxwell has been held accountable.”

“This verdict shows that you can be found guilty no matter your status,” he added.

The juror told The Independent that he found all of Maxwell’s accusers credible and said he knew it was easy to misremember small details of traumatic memories because he, too, was a survivor of sexual abuse.

“I know what happened when I was sexually abused. I remember the color of the carpet, the walls. Some of it can be replayed like a video,” he said. “But I can’t remember all the details, there are some things that run together.”

David said he explained to his fellow jurors that misremembered details don’t mean the incident didn’t occur, The Independent reported.

“When I shared that, they were able to sort of come around on, they were able to come around on the memory aspect of the sexual abuse,” the juror told Reuters in another interview.

He said he was also able to answer questions from other jurors about why the girls hadn’t come forward about the abuse sooner.

“I didn’t disclose my abuse until I was in high school,” Juror No. 50 told The Independent.

He said the jury room went silent when he shared his personal story and that he thought it had helped convince the rest of the jury to believe the victims’ testimony, even when the defense attorneys poked some holes in it.

David also gave an interview to the Daily Mail during which he claimed that he hadn’t been asked about sexual abuse during jury selection.

He said that there was no question about sexual abuse on the juror questionnaire, and then said that if there was, he didn’t remember it.

The Maxwell juror told the Daily Mail that if there was a question about it, he would have answered it honestly.

Jurors were explicitly asked “Have you or a friend or family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault?” the Associated Press reported.

It’s not clear how Juror No. 50 answered the question.

After David’s interviews with The Independent and the Daily Mail were published, prosecutors called for an investigation and defense attorneys called for a mistrial to be declared.

Maxwell’s attorneys immediately announced they would be filing a motion to have the guilty verdict against their client dismissed.

Defense attorneys called the juror’s admissions “incontrovertible grounds” for a new trial, the Daily Mail reported.

Maxwell’s attorneys argued in their motion to Nathan that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a defendant is entitled to a new trial if a party can prove a juror lied on a material question during jury selection, CNN reported.

Nathan has not yet decided if she wants to bring in the juror for questioning.

But in light of the new developments, she did set a briefing schedule for the defense to file motions for a new trial, CNN reported.

The judge also agreed to the prosecutors’ request that the court appoint an attorney to represent Juror No. 50.

But David has hired his own high-profile lawyer, criminal attorney Todd Spodek, The Independent reported.

Written by
Sandy Malone

Managing Editor - Twitter/@SandyMalone_ - Prior to joining The Police Tribune, Sandy wrote the Politics.Net column for the Wall Street Journal and was managing editor of Campaigns & Elections magazine. More recently, she was an internationally-syndicated columnist for Conde Nast (BRIDES), The Huffington Post, and Monsters and Critics. Sandy is married to a retired police captain and former SWAT commander.

View all articles
Written by Sandy Malone


Sign up to our daily newsletter so you don't miss out on the latest events surrounding law enforcement!

Follow Me

Follow us on social media and be sure to mark us as "See First."